WHITE PEOPLE II

In both Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Up from Slavery, each author detail their early lives, and while different in nature, they both talk about the seeming good-naturedness of some of their masters. Both of their accounts are framed in different ways, and both serve the ultimate message of their texts.


In Incidents, Jacobs talks about her relatively carefree childhood in slavery, perhaps appealing to some White assumptions about if chattel slavery was truly cruel, "No toilsome or disagreeable duties were imposed on me. My mistress was so kind to me that I was always glad to do her bidding, and proud to labor for her as much as my young years would permit," but is quick to foreshadow her fate as a slave, "but there came that blight, which too surely waits on every human being born to be a chattel." When Jacobs' childhood mistress dies, she is hopeful that such a kind woman would ultimately grant her freedom, but, of course, "the will of my mistress was read, and we learned that she had bequeathed me to her sister’s daughter, a child of five years old. So vanished our hopes." In this paragraph, Jacobs establishes in the reader's mind that even the most behaviorally antithetical slave owner's best interest is to keep their slaves in bondage. This idea sets up the conclusion of Jacobs' story, in which a white person far removed from the system of slavery inadvertently subverts her freedom and humanity, supporting Incidents' message about the irredeemably evil nature of chattel slavery.


In Up from Slavery, compared to Jacobs, Washington's childhood is much more aligned with that of a "normal" slave child. While he suffers under the trials of slave labor, he always justifies this suffering by reinforcing the innocence of his slave masters and the debilitating effect on both races slavery had. When Washington details his plantation's emancipation, he writes of the slaves that "deep down in their hearts there was a strange and peculiar attachment to 'old Marster' and 'old Missus,'" reflecting Jacobs' view of her past mistress, despite the fact that Washington suffered much more under his masters. By doing this, Washington purges the condition of fair treatment from slaves' assessment of a "good master." At one point, Washington writes, "One may get the idea, from what I have said, that there was bitter feeling toward the white people on the part of my race ...  In the case of the slaves on our place this was not true," and extends this same clemency on the part of all slaves to anywhere "the Negro was treated with anything like decency." With these two quotes, Washington reinforces the view that former slaves were in fact thankful, or at least ambivalent instead of hateful, to their old masters, which supports Up from Slavery's message that black people should "cast down their buckets" without fear of repercussions from the white South.


Overall, Jacobs writes about a more balanced cast of white characters, ranging from the most despicable of humanity to the altruistic, yet flawed. Washington extends his lenient view on his former masters to the millions of slaves who were most likely treated much worse than him, as evidenced by Incidents. Washington's message comes into conflict with reality, and despite his efforts to acknowledge the evil of slavery, he ends up appealing to white Southerners intent on keeping former slaves at a subservient social status.

Comments

  1. I really liked your classification of Jacobs' and Washington's story. However, I sort of disagree that Washington's goal was for the Black community to end up subservient to the whites. While he may have thought that would be the case originally, his focus on economic self-improvement suggests that Black people would not always be in that position.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked the connection that you made between the start of the Incidents and its end regarding the evil of the chattel slavery system. The fact that the story begins and ends with Jacobs' agency being subverted by the system she hates is definitely an intentional framing technique. The framing allows Jacobs to create a through-line showing the all-encompassing and all-corrupting aspects of slavery.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked how you started out by identifying the differences in how they write about their childhoods, and how that could have played into their messages later on. It is clear that Jacob's is not trying to spare details, however horrific they may be, while Washington seems to be doing the opposite. I definitely agree that Washington's narrative portrays slavery as almost a favor, if not at least neutral, appealing to a white audience that would have been outraged at Jacob's writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you compared and contrasted Jacobs' and Washington's intentions for their writing and portrayal of their childhoods. I agree that both stories were made with a similar intention of trying to appeal to a white audience (Jacobs' in the north, Washingtons' in the south), with the authors having different methods of doing so. Jacobs wrote her story to potentially garner sympathy about her conditions, while Washington wrote his to describe how slavery basically helped him build his character.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I enjoy how you look deeply into events in their stories/lives and expand that to how they affected what they wrote and believed. Understanding people's core beliefs and experiences can help us understand their messages and the historical context of the time so much better. I agree that Washington unfairly tried to fit millions of people's views into his own without room for any variation, and even if it was with good intention, I don't think it was the best way to go about things.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you make a very good observation regarding Washington's monolithic treatment of Whiteness. Of course, his attribution of virtue to all White people reflects the general sentiment of the time that Black people were unique in suffering certain deficiencies that they had caused themselves. However, in Washington's context this was indeed a sign of agency. The alternative was to accept narratives that Black people were inherently unworthy of social advancement.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This was a really interesting framework by which you compared the two texts. I think it's important that Jacobs does choose to emphasize the importance of the kindness she received from the white woman who helped her in the north when escaping from slavery. While she does make sure to portray the institution of slavery as "irredeemably evil" as you say, she also wants to appeal to her white female readers in the north to share the same kindness as the white woman did. Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts